Froschs Blog

Computer und was das Leben sonst noch so zu bieten hat

Zur Website | Impressum

The Strange Case of Josef Oehmen

15. März 2011 um 18:19 Uhr von Atari-Frosch

Dies ist eine aus dem Google-Cache entnommene Kopie (entdeckt via @sixtus). Der Original-Artikel stand bei geniusnow.com, und da heißt es mittlerweile, der User sei „suspended”. Macht das mal mit mir auf meinem eigenen Server. :->

Ich hatte den Artikel, auf den sich dieser Autor bezieht, gestern selbst gelesen, und mir waren dabei schon einige Dinge seltsam vorgekommen. Daß der Account des Autors mitsamt diesem Artikel verschwunden ist, macht die Sache noch seltsamer.

Sorry, keine Übersetzung, nur der Originaltext. Die Übersetzung ist mir grad zu viel.


In the wake of the nuclear incidents in Japan, a great deal of information and misinformation has beem spread – some of it deliberately. It’s understandable that people misunderstand, or mishear. Misrepresenting yourself to claim you’re an expert is something else. We expect that from industry and politicians – we don’t exect it from a PhD employed by a school as well-respected as MIT. But that’s just what’s happened, and is still happening now.

On Sunday, March 13th, I saw an interesting link on Facebook. Since the previous Friday, I’d been posting update information on the Japan disasters, and had been one of the first people to post that there might – and I stressed might – be nuclear problems. So when I saw a link saying “MIT scientist says no problems”, it’s only natural to read it.

The post originally came from http://morgsatlarge.wordpress.com. Let’s first note that the name “Jason Morgan” does not appear on the morgsatlarge site. The site has one post (now redirecting to another site, which we’ll get to). Apparently, it was created yesterday. The “about” info is “About morgsatlarge English teacher, F1/ UFC enthusiast. Japan resident, quake survivor, and most importantly a husband to an amazing woman, and father to a beautiful baby girl.”

Jason is on Twitter, though, and thinks his “scientist friend” stuck his neck out for him, and is telling the truth. He’s had a Twitter account longer than last week, and he says Oehmen’s married to his cousin and is an “awesome guy”. Sounds pretty benign, what with his claims the article will be published on mit.edu, and has been vetted by nuke folks at MIT.

Jason had JUST been at the Japanese immigration office when the quake hit. And he sure enough was genuinely worried about the nukes, based on his tweets, in one of which he says he’s “shitting himself”. Nothing real suspicious here.

In the Google cache for the site today, we see this (no longer on the site):

“I do not work for the nuclear industry. I am an English teacher, from Australia, living in Kawasaki, Japan. My friend Dr J. Oehmen is a family member, and by far and away the most intelligent person I know. Feel free to believe/disbelieve whatever we have written. There are no conspiracies, however if you need to, feel free to make some up….

This post is by Dr Josef Oehmen, a research scientist at MIT, in Boston.
He is a PhD Scientist, whose father has extensive experience in Germany’s nuclear industry. I asked him to write this information to my family in Australia, who were being made sick with worry by the media reports coming from Japan. I am republishing it with his permission.”

[Ich kann bestätigen, daß das da so stand, ich hab's nämlich auch gesehen. Frosch]

The site I got linked to, though, was a repost from something called The Energy Collective. http://theenergycollective.com/barrybrook/53461/fukushima-nuclear-accident-simple-and-accurate-explanation. This ONE instance of the article has been shared over 5000 times on facebook, and over 32k times in total.

The Energy Collective is a Siemens AG lobbying/influence/astroturf organization – it says Powered by Siemens right up front. They present as a “Nukes for the Environment” type. The author of the piece here is Barry Brook, who lists himself as a “Professor of Climate Change” on the site. He is – at the University of Adelaide – and is a strong proponent of nuclear power. In other words, he has credentials on climate change, and is pro-nuke. Then let’s note that this is a repost of something Brooks posted on BraveNewClimate. We’ll get back to the crosspostings later.

In his introduction he says “Below I reproduce a summary on the situation prepared by Dr Josef Oehmen, a research scientist at MIT, in Boston. He is a PhD Scientist (sic), whose father has extensive experience in Germany’s nuclear industry. This was first posted by Jason Morgan earlier this evening, and he has kindly allowed me to reproduce it here. I think it is very important that this information be widely understood.”

So let’s look at that “awesome guy”, Josef Oehmen.

Does he have a PhD? – indeed he does. In supply chain risk management. And yes, he’s a “Research Scientist” – that’s his part of his actual job title, not what he does. (LAI Research Scientist appears to be his title.) He’s not in a traditional department – he works for something called the Lean Advancement Initiative (LAI), which is a military-industrial-academic project. As of today, his information page http://lean.mit.edu/about/lai-structure/faculty-researchers-and-staff/oehmen-josef clarifies that he is not involved with nukes at all.

It adds “Josef is working hard with a team from MIT to provide an appropriate response to the interest the post has generated. The original blog will be migrated to an MIT site, managed by a team of experts from MIT’s Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering. The link will be posted here when it becomes available.”

In the Twitter page set up yesterday, he says ”Josef is a research scientist in mechanical engineering and engineering systems at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology“. His about page says “He is a mechanical engineer by training, working on product development processes.” Interesting, not quite the same thing. He also says “MIT setting up information hub on nuclear situation in Japan incl my original post: http://mitnse.com/” on his Twitter page.

Ok, that’s really interesting. Because mitnse.com was registered yesterday, through wordpress.com. That was a Sunday, right? And while the contact information says it’s for MIT, the admin contact is given for an independent contracter, with the contractor’s phone number. The contractor is a graphic designer who has done prior work for the department. (here’s his site: http://www.subbiahdesign.com/web/index.html

There are only a couple of links from the department site – added well after normal working hours on Monday night.

Before “mitnse” killed the comment and rss functions on this wordpress.com site, you could see that rss feed said the site was “maintained by students” in the NSE department. No such students have identified themselves. And while the originally, highly erroneous post has been redacted, the editors have not seen fit to identify themselves.

So – “students” on the site, “experts” in the announcement of it.

The comments were filled with statements about “intellectual dishonesty” and “academic fraud”, as well as point by point rebuttal of many statements Dr Oehmen had originally made. They were killed 5 minutes after I posted the following:

“So far, although I see a link to this site from NSE, I don’t see any discussion of it. And frankly, Mr/MS mitnse, as far as I can tell you’re actually Ismail Subbiah, graphic designer occasionally on contract to MIT. The links between Siemens AG, Dr Oethman, Barry Brook, and MIT/LAI (which has cleverly been avoided – lets do bring that up, shall we?) suggest that no matter why the article was written in the first place, it’s become a major piece of disinformation masquerading falsely as academic opinion.”

As you can see, Siemens AG comes up again. Not surprising, because it recently became an “industry partner” of MIT/LAI. But there is almost certainly another connection. Dr Oehmen is German. If his father spent much time in the German nuclear industry, there is a very very good chance that he worked – or works – for Siemens.

LAI’s website says “LAI accelerates lean deployment through identified best practices, shared communication, common goals, and strategic and implementation tools honed from collaborative experience. LAI also promotes cooperation at all levels and facets of an enterprise to eliminate traditional barriers to improving industry and government teamwork.” http://lean.mit.edu/about/about-lai.

What that doesn’t say is who the industry partners are. Oddly, they are all major defense contractors. And the only one I’ve found so far with any direct connection to nuclear power plants is Siemens.

I’ll be looking deeper at this story, including the mechanisms used to spread the original, and entirely specious, article across the web. It’s still spreading now, mostly from people who would be horrified at this.


Eigenbeschreibung des Autors: „Genius Now is devoted to Resilience. The Reality. The Concept. Many concepts, in fact. Materials science, strategic thinking, futuring, creativity. Above all, the ability of our species to survive, act, and thrive.”

Nun kann sich jeder selbst so seine Gedanken machen ...

2 Kommentare zu “The Strange Case of Josef Oehmen”

  1. Eric quakte:

    Hier mehr Hintergrundinfos (kann das wer übersetzen?)
    http://blog.livedoor.jp/climatescientists/archives/1412483.html

    Möglicherweise Versuch die „Klimalügner“-Szene zu unterwandern. Wobei Oehmens Geschmiere (sorry, als Naturwissenschaftler muß ich das so nennen) natürlich im anderen Lager auch sehr gut ankommt, zB http://www.eike-klima-energie.eu/news-anzeige/nuklearunfall-fukushima-einfach-und-genau-erklaert/ <— Lobbygruppe mit CDU/FDP-Connections

    Was mir etwas Soren macht, ist http://search.twitter.com/search?q=oehmen – eine Menge Japaner scheinen nur auf eine solche "Entwarnung" gewartet zu haben und glauben Oehmen blind. Vermutlich sind viele davon in den von der Ausgangssperre betroffenen Gebieten (140000 Menschen sind angewiesen ihre Wohungen nicht zu verlassen und alle Türen und Fenster dichtzumachen), und haben sich heute ihre Gesundheit beim rumlaufen in der "strahlungsfreien" Frühlingsluft gründlich ruiniert.

    Das grenzt an fahrlässige Tötung.

    Kopf des ganzen ist Prof. Barry Brooks (Klimatologe/Pro-Nuklear-Lobbyist, Uni Adelaide), der die japanische Übersetzung des originalen Oehmen-Artikels (dem das MIT den Stecker gezogen hat) verbreitet: http://bravenewclimate.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/fukushim_explained_japanese_translation.pdf


  2. Püppi quakte:

    Hab den geniusnow-Link heute mittag bei fefe gesehen, da wars aber schon zensiert. Dieser Oehmen-Text war schon bei Veröffentlichung so peinlich, ich verstehe nicht, wie den jemand ernst nehmen kann. Aber das Bedürfnis nach Beruhigung macht dumm. Nach Tschernobyl hielten sich alle für verstrahlt, das lag im Zeitgeist — vielleicht sind jetzt ja die Anti-80er Jahre. Sogar Sam Ruby ist drauf reingefallen[1]. Das tut richtig weh. Ich weiß, das ist kein Physiker, aber ich hatte ihn für einen intelligenten und intellektuell sorgfältigen Menschen gehalten.

    [1] http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2011/03/14/Fukushima-in-Perspective